Spinal Neoplasms Diagnostic Imaging Approach Part I
Share
Metastatic Bone Disease (aka Mets) or “Secondaries.” Are the most common malignant bone neoplasms affecting the spine, aka spinal neoplasms (>70%) and the rest of the skeleton in adults.
5-Primaries are m/c involved:
Breast (16-37%)
Lung (12-15%)
Thyroid (4%)
Renal (3-6%)
Prostate (9-15%)
Spine, pelvis, proximal femurs & proximal humeri are m/c affected in that particular order of frequency
Thoracic & upper Lumbar spine considered the m/c site of spinal Mets
Table of Contents
Pathophysiology & Etiology of Metastasis
Malignant cells a very good at evading immune detection and elimination
They gain access to circulation expressing Vascular Endothelial Adhesion Molecules (e.g., integrines & selectins)
Once reaching their target organs, malignant cells stimulate the production of various vasogenic growth factors and by exiting blood vessels invade their target tissues
Lung, Liver, and Bone are particularly at risk due to the character of their blood supply
Baston venous plexus-is a network of valveless freely communicating veins connecting axial skeleton/meninges and proximal femurs/humeri with abdomino-pelvic and thoracic cavities
The risk of Mets is increased during daily variations in the intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressure
In adults, the axial skeleton is involved in hematopoiesis, and it is particularly vulnerable to metastatic deposits via an abundant network of sinusoids within a spongy bone
The vast majority of bone Mets will be detected in the axial skeleton
Clinical Presentation
Back pain often mimicking “mechanical back pain” is the m/c and often misleading symptom
Chiropractors and other manipulators should be particularly aware of this dangerous pitfall.
Nocturnal pain or pain unresponsive to NSAID may be reported in more advanced cases
Advanced cases may also present with a neurological deficit due to pathologic vertebral fractures and spinal cord/nerves compression
Metastatic hypercalcemia may occasionally develop in severe cases and considered a medical emergency that potentially presents with confusion, muscle weakness, and renal signs
Imaging plays a significant role in the Dx and management of bone metastasis
Lab tests are of limited value, but hypercalcemia and alkaline phosphatase (Alk Phos) may be elevated
In some cases, a bone biopsy may be used to confirm bone Mets
When Bone Mets are Detected, Patients Prognosis is Significantly Worsened
Median survival:
Thyroid – 48 – months
Prostate – 40 – months
Breast – 24 – months
Renal Cell – may vary, can be as low as 6 – months
Lung – 6 – months
Imaging Diagnosis
Begins with radiography investigating a clinical complaint of back/bone pain
If radiographs are unrewarding or equivocal, unique imaging modalities are required
MRI may help to show marrow replacement by Mets foci but limited to specific regions
Tc99 radionuclide bone scan (scintigraphy) is considered one of the most sensitive and reliable imaging steps in evaluating bone Mets
Bone scintigraphy is good at detecting both lytic and blastic Mets
However, very aggressive/vascular osteolytic Mets and Multiple Myeloma often appear “cold” or photopenic on bone scan due to greater stimulation/activation of osteoclasts which “outpace” osteoblasts ability to uptake the radiopharmaceutical
CT scanning is an excellent modality to show bone destruction, but it is not widely used during bone Mets Dx especially if radiography, bone scintigraphy, and MRI provide adequate information about the process
CT scanning may be particularly helpful with delineation of pathological fractures
General Radiographic Features of Bone Mets
Osteolytic (lytic), osteoblastic (blastic) aka sclerotic Mets or misec Mets can be identified radiographicallyÂ
However, it takes between 30-50% of lamella (cortical) bone and 50-75% of trabecular (cancellous) or spongy bone to be destroyed before it can be detected on plain film radiographs
This can make early radiographic detection of bone Mets very difficult, requiring particular imaging modalities (e.g., MRI)
Also, bowel gas/fecal matter and numerous soft tissue densities in the abdomino-pelvic and thoracic cavities may pose challenges of bone Mets detection
Different tumors often manifest with different metastatic appearance, depending on tumor activity and release of cytokines (IL6, IL11), endothelin 1 or other growth factors that will be responsible for either osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed Mets
For example: purely lytic bone Mets are noted in Lung, Thyroid, and Renal cell CA (very vascular)
Breast CA may present with 60% of blastic Mets
Prostate CA presents with 90% of blastic Mets
Other blastic Mets may derive from urinary bladder, melanoma and GI adenocarcinomas
Sclerotic foci may also represent as previously treated primaries
Very vascular Mets like Renal cell and Thyroid may present with markedly lytic and expansile foci often called “blow out Mets.”
Mets found distal to elbows and knees (acro-metastasis) are commonly associated with Lung CA
PA chest view of a routinely screened patient with a known Hx of Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Note sclerotic lesion identified in the left posterior Rib 5
What imaging modality is required next?
Radionuclide bone scan should be suggested
Multiple foci of high uptake of the Tc99 radiopharmaceutical
This is due to Mets and increased osteoblastic activity in the thoracic and lumbar spine, ribs and other sites of the skeleton
Comparison of purely lytic (a and b) versus blastic (d) and mixed (c) Mets
What primaries to consider?
Frog leg view of the hip
Clinical Dx: Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Note diffuse blastic Mets in the proximal femur
Hx: severe shoulder and arm pain unrelieved by rest
Rad DDx: Mets, Myeloma or less frequently Lymphoma
This classic DDx is used by the majority of Radiologists when aggressive osteolytic bone lesions are noted
The patient had a known Hx of Breast CA
A 51-year-old female with Breast CA
Large lytic destructive lesion in the distal femoral metaphysis characteristic of aggressive osteolytic Mets
Sudden onset of severe leg pain and inability to stand in a 53-year-old female with Breast CA
Dx: Pathological fracture through the distal femoral shaft
Pathological Mets fractures in the spine and extremities are dreaded by most Oncologists due to higher association with severe complications and poor clinical prognosis
Radiographic Dx of vertebral Mets should be suspected if a “missing pedicle sign” aka “winking owl sign” is noted
DDx: pedicle agenesis (above left) shows hypertrophy and sclerosis of a contralateral pedicle d/t increased mechanical stress
Pedicle Mets are often thought of as the m/c initial site of spinal Mets
Vertebral Body Pathologic Fracture (VERTEBRA PLANA)
Isolated compression fracture at the T8 segment noted (above arrow)
The loss of the posterior and anterior height suggest an underlying pathologic condition for which the differential diagnosis includes:
Differentiating Pathological Fx of the vertebral body from an osteoporotic insufficiency Fx can be a significant challenge
Close inspection of the posterior body height is helpful but often not reliable
In metastasis, the posterior body is collapsed
In OSP, the posterior body may be maintained appearing more as anteriorly wedge fracture
MR imaging and/or radionuclide bone scan need to be performed
A skeletal radiographic survey may be used occasionally for the evaluation of bone Mets especially in well-established cases
It includes bilateral AP & lateral Thoracic and Lumbar views, AP pelvis, humeri, femurs, and the skull
Availability of special imaging has supplanted the use of skeletal radiographic survey
However, in a clinical practice skeletal radiographic study of Multiple Myeloma may still be used primarily if the diagnosis was previously established
Technetium-99 (99mTc) bone scintigraphy is very sensitive and cost-effective study:
For the detection/localization of Mets and often an assessment of their biologic activity and response to treatment
This modality is a well-established part of the workup for known as well as unknown primaries
It may also help with determination of lesions that will be most accessible and easy to biopsy
When the burden of Mets is significantly high as shown in the case above
The radiotracer uptake is being almost entirely taken in by metastatic lesions
No material is left for the kidneys to excrete
This is known as a “super scan”
Sagittal Lumbar and Lower Thoracic MRI. Multiple metastasis are noted on T1 (above right) and T2 (above left)Â WI as hypointense foci of marrow replacement of the vertebral bodies in a patient with Hx of Prostate CA
MR imaging protocol with T1, T2, and T1+C gad can be used in many cases if x-radiography is unrewarding or questionable
 MRI can reveal bone marrow changes due to bone marrow replacement by Mets and surrounding edema
Typically blastic Mets appear as abnormally decreased signal intensity (hypointense) lesions on T1 and T2 pulse sequences
Purely lytic Mets often appear as hypo-intense on T1 and hype-intense on T2
Increased gadolinium uptake may also be evident on T1+C fat suppressed sequence d/t increased vascularity of malignant foci especially in very aggressive vascular neoplasms