Discover how obesity medicine integrates with chiropractic practice for effective weight management and enhanced wellness.
Table of Contents
Hello, I’m Dr. Alex Jimenez. With my extensive background as a Doctor of Chiropractic (DC), Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), and Board-Certified Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP-BC), complemented by certifications in Functional Medicine (CFMP, IFMCP), Advanced Traditional Nutrigenomics (ATN), and Cranial Cervical Spinal Therapy (CCST), my career has been dedicated to understanding and treating the intricate web of human health. This educational post synthesizes cutting-edge findings from leading researchers in obesity medicine and offers a detailed roadmap for managing obesity as a chronic disease throughout a patient’s lifespan. We will explore the critical importance of a chronic disease management model for obesity, similar to how we approach conditions like diabetes or hypertension. We will also examine the importance of creating a destigmatized, supportive environment for individuals managing obesity, exploring how the physical space, language, and imagery we use can profoundly impact a patient’s journey.
This guide then transitions into the complex world of billing and coding for obesity, demystifying the ICD-10 coding system and the two primary billing methods—time-based billing and medical decision-making (MDM)—and providing clear, practical examples. Beyond standard office visits, we will explore ancillary services that can profoundly improve patient outcomes, including Medicare’s Intensive Behavioral Therapy (IBT), Chronic Care Management (CCM), and Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM). This post will detail the four foundational pillars of evidence-based obesity treatment: nutrition, physical activity, behavioral counseling, and medical management. I will outline practice models and provide actionable strategies for structuring patient appointments and follow-up schedules. A significant portion of this discussion focuses on the physiological underpinnings of obesity, exploring the complex interplay of genetics, epigenetics, hormones, and environmental factors that drive this condition.
Finally, this post will show how these principles come to life at the Injury Medical Clinic PA (also known as Mission Plaza Injury Medical Clinic) in El Paso, Texas. I will explain our unique multidisciplinary model, where my work in chiropractic care, functional medicine, and rehabilitation is seamlessly integrated with the medical oversight of our esteemed Medical Director and Collaborative Physician, Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD. Dr. Cardenas, a Board-Certified Internist with over four decades of experience (NPI #1164426749, Texas MD License #J2933), provides the essential medical direction that anchors our integrative approach. This collaborative approach allows us to address not only the metabolic but also the biomechanical and neurological aspects of obesity, ensuring a truly comprehensive path to wellness for our patients.
At Injury Medical Clinic PA, we have cultivated a unique and powerful healthcare environment. I am Dr. Alex Jimenez, and my journey in healthcare has led me to earn a diverse set of credentials, including DC, APRN, and FNP-BC, along with advanced certifications in functional and integrative medicine. This multidisciplinary expertise underpins our practice. Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD, our esteemed Medical Director, is central to our collaborative model. Dr. Cardenas is a Board-Certified Internist with over 40 years of invaluable experience (NPI #1164426749, Texas MD License #J2933). As the collaborative physician, she provides essential medical oversight and ensures all our treatment protocols meet the highest standards of medical care. Dr. Cardenas directs medical policy and standards, supervises diagnostic and pharmacologic pathways, and serves as the Collaborative Physician in our integrated practice model.
This synergy between a Doctor of Chiropractic with advanced practice nursing and functional medicine training and a seasoned Medical Doctor in Internal Medicine is the cornerstone of our integrative approach. Our setup is common in integrative and injury care clinics: an MD offers medical direction and collaborative oversight, while chiropractors and advanced practice providers implement hands-on assessment, spine and joint care, neuromuscular rehabilitation, and functional medicine protocols. Together, we blend objective diagnostics, guideline-based management, and restorative care to address obesity as a chronic, systemic disease with mechanical, inflammatory, metabolic, and behavioral dimensions. This allows us to blend a wide spectrum of services seamlessly:
This integrated, multidisciplinary setup is designed to treat the whole person, not just the symptoms. By combining the strengths of chiropractic, internal medicine, and functional medicine, we offer comprehensive care that addresses the complex, multifaceted nature of obesity and its associated health challenges. Our mission is to make the journey easy to follow, deeply evidence-based, and genuinely patient-centered—protecting dignity, expanding access, and improving long-term outcomes.
For far too long, obesity has been viewed through a simplistic lens of “calories in, calories out,” often accompanied by societal stigma and blame. However, modern, evidence-based research has definitively reframed obesity as a complex, multifactorial chronic disease, much like diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia (Bray et al., 2017). This foundational principle guides our entire approach to treatment. Adopting a chronic disease model is not merely a semantic change; it fundamentally alters how we structure care, manage patient expectations, and commit to long-term wellness. Obesity is not simply about weight; it is a chronic, relapsing, neuro-metabolic disease characterized by maladaptive energy regulation, hormonal signaling imbalance, adipose tissue dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and environmental-genetic interactions.
Viewing obesity as a chronic disease means we acknowledge that it requires long-term, sustained management. It is not a condition that can be “cured” with a short-term diet or a single intervention. Instead, it involves a lifelong journey of management, adaptation, and support. The physiological processes that regulate body weight are incredibly powerful and redundant. The body has numerous homeostatic mechanisms designed to defend its highest-ever body weight, a phenomenon often called the “set point” theory. When an individual loses weight, a cascade of hormonal and metabolic adaptations occurs:
These powerful biological responses explain why most individuals who lose weight through lifestyle changes alone eventually regain it. It is not a failure of willpower but a predictable physiological response. Therefore, our treatment strategies must counteract these biological drivers over the long term, which is the hallmark of chronic disease management. Just as we would never tell a patient with hypertension to stop their medication once their blood pressure is controlled, we must not abandon our patients with obesity once they have reached a target weight. Ongoing support, monitoring, and treatment-plan adaptation are crucial for sustained success.
Many of our patients also experience musculoskeletal pain, mobility limitations, sleep disturbances, and cardiometabolic risks (insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia). An integrative clinic is uniquely positioned to address this multi-system reality. Key drivers of chronic obesity include:
A common pitfall in primary care is treating obesity as an afterthought during an appointment for another acute or chronic issue. Trying to “squeeze in” a discussion about weight management at the end of a 15-minute visit for a sinus infection is not only ineffective but can also be counterproductive. It trivializes the complexity of the disease and can leave the patient feeling rushed, unheard, and overwhelmed.
Effective obesity treatment requires dedicated, obesity-specific appointments. These appointments provide the necessary time to conduct a thorough assessment, which includes:
These dedicated visits allow for a collaborative, patient-centered dialogue where we can set realistic goals, develop a personalized treatment plan, and provide the education and counseling needed to empower the patient. Cramming this into another visit does not work and disrespects the gravity of the condition.
Obesity management is a marathon, not a sprint. Regular follow-up is essential for success. The data is clear. Research shows that more frequent contact with a healthcare provider is directly associated with better weight-loss outcomes (Madigan et al., 2017). A landmark study showed that patients who attended an average of sixteen visits per year, particularly in the first year of treatment, achieved significantly greater and more sustained weight loss.
Why is this frequency so important?
Unfortunately, insurance coverage can sometimes dictate the frequency of these visits. Navigating the complexities of billing and coding, which we will discuss later, becomes critical to ensuring patients receive the care they need. However, the clinical principle remains: the more intensive and consistent the follow-up, the better the outcome.
As a healthcare provider, I have dedicated my career to understanding the intricate connections between the body’s structure, its function, and a patient’s overall well-being. A foundational principle of my practice, and one that is increasingly supported by leading research, is that the environment in which care is delivered is just as crucial as the treatment itself. This is particularly true when we are addressing a condition as complex and emotionally charged as obesity. The first step in a patient’s healing journey often begins the moment they walk through our clinic doors. My goal, and our entire team’s goal at Injury Medical Clinic, is to ensure this first step is taken in a space that feels safe, supportive, and completely free of judgment. We must focus intentionally on healthful behaviors and move away from any messaging that could inadvertently cause harm.
For far too long, societal and even medical narratives surrounding obesity have been intertwined with destructive concepts. We must be vigilant in purging our clinical environments of anything that promotes:
It is a sobering reality that many healthcare settings, even with the best intentions, still contain materials that perpetuate these harmful ideas. How many times have you walked into a clinic waiting room and seen magazines filled with airbrushed celebrities, articles promising “bikini bodies in 30 days,” or advertisements for processed, unhealthful foods? For a patient seeking help for obesity, these messages can be profoundly discouraging and invalidating. They implicitly suggest that their value is tied to their appearance and that their struggle is a matter of willpower, not a complex chronic disease. This is why, in my practice, we have made a conscious decision to eliminate such materials. An obesity-focused clinic, or frankly any healthcare facility dedicated to genuine wellness, has a responsibility to curate an environment that uplifts and empowers, rather than one that subtly shames.
This commitment extends beyond the physical magazines on a coffee table; it permeates every aspect of our communication, especially the images we use in our marketing materials, on our websites, and within educational articles like this one. The visual representation of people with obesity has historically been problematic and deeply stigmatizing. I am sure you have seen the common, dehumanizing tropes:
These visual strategies are not benign. They contribute to a culture of blame and disrespect, which can be internalized by patients, leading to reduced self-esteem and avoidance of medical care. As clinicians and researchers in the field advocate, we must move decisively away from this practice. In all my presentations and publications, including this one, I deliberately use images that portray people with obesity in a positive, dignified light. The goal is to show individuals of all sizes living full, active lives. We should be showcasing them engaged in healthful, joyful activities—walking in nature, playing with their children, cooking a nutritious meal, or participating in a community event. These images send a powerful message: that health is about vitality and engagement with life, not about a number on a scale or conforming to a narrow societal ideal.
We are fortunate that the movement to destigmatize obesity has gained momentum, along with the resources to help us change this visual narrative. Several high-quality image galleries now provide respectful, positive, and non-stigmatizing photos of people with obesity. These are invaluable tools for any practice committed to compassionate care. All of them are available free of charge, with the simple requirement of proper citation. I have used images from all these sources in my work and have listed them here for your reference. By using these images, we are not just decorating our materials; we are actively participating in the crucial work of dismantling stigma and redefining what it means to pursue health.
The physical and interpersonal environment profoundly shapes patient experiences, particularly for those living with obesity who may carry scars from stigma and healthcare encounters.
The clinical environment communicates value and safety. Small design choices can prevent harm and build trust. By embracing these principles, we transform our clinics from places of clinical assessment into true sanctuaries for healing. We communicate to our patients, from the very first moment, that we see them as whole people, respect their journey, and are here to partner with them in building a life of health and vitality, free from the weight of stigma.
Negative experiences in healthcare are frequent among people with obesity. We counter that by educating every team member—from front desk to clinicians—on respectful, consistent practices.
The goal is to ensure that patients feel emotionally and physically safe, respected, and supported. When we reduce bias and stigma, care engagement rises and outcomes improve.
Patients often encounter our clinic first through our website and social presence. The language and imagery we choose matter.
Our media aims to invite patients into a process that honors their experience and encourages sustainable change. This foundational respect is the bedrock of all successful, long-term treatment.
Once we embrace the chronic disease framework, the next step is deciding how to structure care delivery within our practice. No one-size-fits-all solution exists; the best model depends on your practice setting, available resources, and patient population. I will outline three primary models that you can adapt to your specific circumstances.
This is often the most accessible starting point for primary care clinicians. In this model, you don’t create a separate clinic or program; instead, you strategically schedule obesity-specific appointments within your existing daily schedule. For example, you might designate a few slots each day or a specific morning each week for these longer, more comprehensive visits.
In our clinic, when a patient presents for personal injury or chiropractic care, we often identify obesity as a significant co-factor impacting their recovery. We can then schedule them for a dedicated functional medicine and obesity management workup, seamlessly integrating this care into their overall treatment plan.
As the demand for obesity treatment grows, many practices find it beneficial to create a separate, dedicated obesity treatment program within their current setting. This is a more structured approach where you might designate a specific block of time, such as every Wednesday afternoon, as your “Obesity & Wellness Clinic.”
This model allows for a more streamlined process. For example, during “Obesity Clinic” hours, medical assistants can be trained to perform specific tasks like body composition analysis, waist circumference measurements, and administering validated questionnaires on eating behaviors, making the entire process more efficient and standardized.
The third option is to establish a stand-alone obesity clinic, separate from any other practice. This can be an in-person practice, a fully telehealth-based practice, or a hybrid of the two. This model suits clinicians who want to dedicate their career primarily or exclusively to treating obesity.
The rise of telehealth has revolutionized this space. It enables frequent, convenient check-ins that are crucial to success. A 15-minute video call from the patient’s home can be just as effective as an in-person visit for many follow-up appointments, removing barriers like travel time and childcare.
Regardless of the practice model you choose, the treatment itself must be built upon a foundation of evidence-based principles. I conceptualize this as the four pillars of comprehensive obesity treatment. A successful program must integrate all four of these components. As the clinician, you decide which elements you will provide directly and which you will coordinate through referrals.
Nutrition is the cornerstone of any weight management plan, but it is also the area most fraught with misinformation and dogma. Our approach must be patient-centered, flexible, and grounded in science, not fads. The goal is not to prescribe a rigid, one-size-fits-all “diet” but to help patients develop a sustainable, healthy eating pattern for life.
Physiological Underpinnings:
The core principle of nutritional intervention for weight loss is creating a caloric deficit. However, calorie quality matters as much as quantity. Different macronutrients affect satiety, hormones, and metabolism in distinct ways.
Clinical Application:
No single diet is “best.” The most effective eating plan is the one a patient can follow long term (Johnston et al., 2014). Common evidence-based approaches include:
The key is personalization. A functional medicine approach lets us tailor nutritional plans to a patient’s genetics (nutrigenomics), metabolic markers (e.g., insulin, HbA1c), food sensitivities, and gut health.
Physical activity is a critical component of overall health, but its role in weight management is often misunderstood. While it is very difficult to achieve significant weight loss through exercise alone, physical activity is arguably the single most important factor in maintaining weight loss.
Physiological Underpinnings:
The benefits of physical activity extend far beyond just burning calories:
Clinical Application:
A comprehensive physical activity plan should include three components:
The Role of Chiropractic Care: For many patients with obesity, pain is a major barrier to physical activity. Chronic back pain, knee osteoarthritis, and plantar fasciitis are common. This is where integrative chiropractic care becomes indispensable. By addressing spinal misalignments (subluxations), correcting biomechanical faults, and reducing musculoskeletal pain through adjustments, soft tissue therapies, and rehabilitative exercises, we can help patients move again. We help them break the vicious cycle where pain prevents activity, and inactivity worsens both the pain and the obesity.
Obesity is not just a disease of metabolism; it is also a disease of behavior. The choices we make every day—what to eat, when to eat, how much to move—are driven by a complex interplay of habits, emotions, cognitions, and environmental cues. Behavioral counseling is the pillar that addresses the “why” behind these choices.
Psychological and Neurological Underpinnings:
Modern neuroscience has revealed that the same brain circuits involved in addiction are also involved in the consumption of highly palatable, energy-dense foods (Volkow et al., 2013). Dopamine release in the brain’s reward center (the nucleus accumbens) reinforces eating behaviors, creating powerful, conditioned responses.
Clinical Application:
Behavioral strategies are woven into every patient interaction. Key techniques include:
The fourth pillar encompasses all medical interventions, including pharmacotherapy, managing complications, and considering bariatric procedures. For many patients, especially those with more severe obesity or significant comorbidities, lifestyle changes alone are not enough to overcome the powerful biological drive to regain weight.
Pharmacotherapy:
The advent of new, highly effective anti-obesity medications (AOMs) has transformed the landscape of obesity treatment. These are not the “diet pills” of the past; they are sophisticated pharmaceuticals that target the underlying neurohormonal pathways regulating appetite and energy balance.
The decision to use AOMs is based on a patient’s BMI (typically> 30 or> 27 with a comorbidity), their clinical profile, and a shared decision-making process. These medications are not a “magic bullet,” but a powerful tool to use alongside the other three pillars.
Managing Complications:
A crucial part of our role is to screen for, diagnose, and manage the numerous complications of obesity, which can affect nearly every organ system. This includes:
At our clinic, Dr. Cardenas’s internal medicine expertise is vital for managing these complex medical issues. In contrast, my functional medicine and chiropractic background allows us to address root causes and musculoskeletal consequences.
Bariatric Procedures:
For patients with severe obesity (BMI> 40 or> 35 with significant comorbidities), bariatric surgery remains the most effective and durable treatment option. Procedures like the sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass induce weight loss through a combination of restriction (smaller stomach size), malabsorption (in the case of bypass), and profound, favorable changes in gut hormones (e.g., increased GLP-1 and PYY, decreased ghrelin). We must identify appropriate candidates for surgery and refer them to a qualified bariatric surgery center for evaluation.
Now that we’ve established the four pillars, let’s translate them into a practical structure for patient appointments. Visit intensity and frequency will vary, but a structured approach is key.
The first month of treatment is the most intensive and is critical for establishing a strong therapeutic alliance and a comprehensive plan.
Once you’ve laid the initial foundation, you can often extend the frequency of visits.
Once a patient has achieved their initial weight loss goals, the focus shifts to the most challenging part: long-term maintenance.
No single clinician can be an expert in everything. Building a team, whether in-house or through a trusted referral network, is essential for providing truly comprehensive care. Here, I’ll detail the four main approaches to structuring your treatment team.
In this model, you, the primary clinician, provide all four pillars of care. You provide nutritional counseling, physical activity recommendations, behavioral therapy, and medical management.
Here, you act as the “quarterback” of the treatment plan, managing the overall strategy while leveraging an in-house support team to implement specific components.
In this model, you still manage the overall treatment plan, but you refer patients to trusted professionals outside of your practice for specific services. This is a common, highly effective model for clinicians without in-house resources.
This option is for the clinician who recognizes the importance of obesity treatment but lacks the training, time, or resources to provide it directly. In this case, your role is to identify the disease, motivate the patient to seek treatment, and refer them effectively to a specialist.
As we move from the philosophical and environmental aspects of patient care to the more pragmatic operational details, I want to address a topic often viewed as a purely administrative burden: billing and coding. Many clinicians, myself included, are driven by a passion for helping patients, and the intricacies of codes and reimbursement can seem distant from that core mission. However, I want to emphasize that understanding and accurately applying these systems is one of the most powerful ways we can advance obesity medicine and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes. It is about much more than just ensuring we get paid for our services.
Let’s begin with a fundamental question: Why should we, as clinicians, care so deeply about billing and coding for obesity? The most immediate answer, of course, is for our own practice’s financial viability. But looking at the bigger picture reveals a far more profound impact. The estimated annual economic burden of obesity in the United States is staggering, reaching approximately two hundred and sixty billion dollars. This figure encompasses direct medical costs, lost productivity, and other related expenses. When we, as frontline providers, accurately diagnose and code for obesity, we are contributing to a data set that paints a true and complete picture of the prevalence and impact of this chronic disease.
Why is this data so important? Let’s break down the far-reaching effects of diligent coding:
To apply these principles effectively, it is helpful to have a conceptual understanding of the coding landscape. The national coding system is a complex, general hierarchical structure, and while we don’t need to be experts in every detail, grasping the relationships between its components is empowering.
At a high level, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) governs the system. Within this framework, we interact with several key coding sets:
This structure ensures that the service we provide (CPT) is medically necessary for the diagnosis we have made (ICD-10). Accurate use of both is essential for a clean claim and for contributing to the valuable data we have been discussing.
One of the most significant recent developments in this area was the update to the ICD-10 codes for obesity, which took effect on October 1, 2024. This was not merely an administrative change; it represented a crucial clinical shift for several important reasons. These updates reflect a more modern, nuanced understanding of obesity and empower us to be better clinicians and advocates.
So, what is our immediate action step as clinicians? We must ensure that our Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems are updated to include these new codes. This is a conversation to have with your practice management staff and your billing and coding team. Verifying this simple technical update is the first step to putting these powerful new tools into practice.
Now that we’ve established the importance of the updated ICD-10 codes, let’s delve into how to use them in our daily clinical workflow. The true power of these codes comes from using them correctly to build a detailed, accurate clinical picture.
The central concept to grasp is obesity classification and its connection to Body Mass Index (BMI). The primary obesity diagnosis codes fall under the E66 category in ICD-10-CM. The new system refines this by specifying obesity classes, which directly correlate with BMI ranges.
However, simply using an “E” code is not enough. The key to proper coding under the new guidelines is to connect the obesity diagnosis (the E code) to a “Z” code for the patient’s BMI (specifically, from the Z68 category). This linkage determines the severity of the diagnosis and provides the complete picture payers and data analysts require.
The single biggest takeaway I want you to have from this section is this: Always use both E and Z codes together. Never document an obesity diagnosis with just the E code without also including the corresponding Z code for the patient’s BMI. These Z codes are what are known as risk adjustment codes. They directly influence the patient’s perceived complexity and, consequently, the payment received. The logic is straightforward: a higher BMI represents a higher risk of comorbidities and complications, indicating higher care complexity. Properly documenting this complexity is essential for both clinical accuracy and financial sustainability.
The updated coding system also brings much-needed clarity and precision to diagnosing pediatric obesity. The new codes for children and adolescents reflect the latest clinical guidelines, which use percentiles rather than absolute BMI values. This distinction matters because you must interpret a child’s BMI in the context of age and sex.
When treating a pediatric patient between the ages of 2 and 18, the process involves a few key steps:
The diagnosis is then based on where the child falls on these percentile charts. Notice how the new Z codes reflect this percentile-based system. They are specific to age ranges and gender.
This nuanced approach allows for a much more accurate diagnosis in a growing child, where absolute BMI numbers can be misleading. The key is recognizing that, in pediatrics, obesity is classified by age- and gender-specific percentiles, and the coding must reflect this methodology.
Obesity is not a singular condition; it is a gateway to a vast array of other chronic health problems. Research has identified over two hundred possible complications of obesity, ranging from type 2 diabetes and hypertension to osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, and certain types of cancer. This list represents just a small fraction of the potential downstream effects.
A significant finding from health services research is that, historically, patients with obesity are primarily coded and treated for these complications, rather than for the underlying disease of obesity itself. We have all seen this in practice: a patient’s problem list might include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, but the root driver—obesity—is either omitted or listed as a minor afterthought.
Why does this happen? We believe many providers have traditionally coded for complications first because, in the past, reimbursement was more reliable for treating these established diseases. There was a perception, and often a reality, that insurers would not pay as well (or at all) for visits focused solely on “weight management.” This practice, while understandable from a reimbursement perspective, has contributed to the systemic de-prioritization of obesity care. The new coding guidelines and a growing recognition of obesity as a disease are working to change this, but it requires a conscious shift in our coding habits. This leads directly to the strategic decision of how to sequence our diagnoses.
Whether to code obesity as the primary or a secondary diagnosis is not just an administrative preference; it is a clinical decision that should reflect the focus of the patient encounter. The best way to determine the correct approach is to view the situation through the lens of the patient’s main reason for the visit.
The primary diagnosis code should always reflect the main reason for the encounter or the most significant health issue addressed during that visit. Let’s consider two common scenarios:
If you work in a specialized obesity clinic or have dedicated obesity-specific visits in your practice, you will likely code obesity as the primary diagnosis for most of those encounters. The key is that the coding must accurately reflect the narrative and focus of the visit documented in your chart notes.
In my years of practice, I have learned that providing exceptional clinical care is only one part of the equation. To truly make a lasting impact and run a successful, sustainable clinic, we must also become adept at the administrative side of healthcare, particularly billing and coding. It’s the engine that powers our ability to offer the comprehensive, integrative services our patients deserve. When we code accurately and ethically, we are not just seeking reimbursement; we are communicating the value and complexity of the work we do. Let’s break down the two primary avenues for billing evaluation and management (E/M) services: time-based billing and medical decision-making.
Time-based billing is an essential tool, especially in obesity and functional medicine, where a significant portion of our patient encounters is dedicated to counseling, education, and detailed care planning. This method allows us to be compensated for the total time spent on a patient’s care on the day of the encounter, not just the face-to-face portion.
To use this method effectively, it’s crucial to document the time spent on various activities meticulously. I break this down into three distinct phases for every patient encounter: before, during, and after the visit.
Let’s put this into a real-world scenario to see how the minutes add up. Consider a follow-up visit for a patient undergoing treatment for obesity and related metabolic syndrome.
Total Time = 3 + 5 + 20 + 5 = 33 minutes.
This 33-minute visit for an established patient corresponds to a CPT code 99214. As you can see, most of the time was spent on counseling, which is typical for these visits. This is why time-based billing is often more advantageous for obesity care; it reflects the cognitive and educational labor involved, which medical decision-making alone may not capture.
The second billing method is based on the complexity of the Medical Decision-Making (MDM) involved in the visit. This is the more traditional approach many of us learned in primary care. Since the 2021 E/M guideline changes, MDM has been streamlined and now rests on three core elements. To determine the level of service, you generally need to meet the criteria for two of these three elements.
A key distinction of MDM is that you can account for decision-making that occurs outside the date of service. For example, if you spend time reviewing a complex imaging report two days before the patient’s appointment, you can count that work toward the MDM level for the subsequent visit.
As a rule of thumb in my practice, I often assume I am working at a Level 4 visit (99204 for a new patient, 99214 for an established patient), especially if the encounter involves any of the following:
These activities almost automatically signal moderate complexity and risk, which aligns with a Level 4 visit.
The Bottom Line: When visits focus heavily on obesity counseling, with little changing in the medical plan, time-based billing often reflects your work more accurately and favorably. However, for shorter visits, including many telemedicine appointments, where you are making a significant medical decision like a medication change, MDM-based billing is often the superior choice. A 15-minute telehealth check-in where you adjust a patient’s medication dose qualifies as prescription drug management and can justifiably be coded as a 99214, even though the time spent is short.
Let’s walk through a recent case from my clinic to illustrate the MDM process.
To determine the billing level, I ask myself three key questions, aiming for a “yes” on at least two to justify a Level 4 code.
Since we met the criteria for moderate complexity in at least two of the three elements (Problem and Risk), we can confidently code this visit as a 99214. Managing the prescription, even though it was a dose reduction, was the deciding factor that elevated the visit’s complexity.
To provide a clear, at-a-glance resource, this table summarizes the CPT codes for new and established patients and links them to both time-based and MDM criteria. I also included a general reimbursement estimate
| Patient Type | CPT Code | Time-Based Requirement (Total Time on Date of Service) | Medical Decision-Making (MDM) Level | Estimated Reimbursement (General) |
| New Patient | 99202 | 15-29 minutes | Straightforward | ~$80 |
| 99203 | 30-44 minutes | Low | ~$120 | |
| 99204 | 45-59 minutes | Moderate | ~$180 | |
| 99205 | 60-74 minutes | High | ~$240 | |
| Established Patient | 99212 | 10-19 minutes | Straightforward | ~$50 |
| 99213 | 20-29 minutes | Low | ~$85 | |
| 99214 | 30-39 minutes | Moderate | ~$125 | |
| 99215 | 40-54 minutes | High | ~$170 |
Important Disclaimer: These reimbursement figures are highly generalized estimates. Actual pay rates vary significantly by state, specific insurance payer contracts, and your credentials as a provider. For a more precise understanding of reimbursement in your location, I strongly recommend using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. This tool allows you to search for CPT codes and apply a geographic filter to see the rates applicable to your state.
To build a truly comprehensive and effective obesity management program, we must think beyond the traditional E/M office visit. The modern healthcare landscape offers several avenues to provide ongoing support, education, and monitoring for our patients. These services not only improve clinical outcomes but also create a more sustainable and engaging practice model. Let’s explore some of the most valuable ancillary services: behavioral health counseling, preventive care, chronic care management, and remote patient monitoring.
This chart provides a quick overview of these services and their associated billing codes:
| Service Type | Target Population | Primary Billing Codes | Key Function |
| Intensive Behavioral Therapy (IBT) | Medicare | G0447, G0473 | Behavioral change for weight loss |
| Preventive Care Counseling | Commercial Insurance | 99401 – 99404 | Behavioral/risk factor counseling |
| Chronic Care Management (CCM) | Medicare | 99490, 99491, 99487, etc. | Non-face-to-face care coordination |
| Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) | Medicare & Commercial | 99453, 99454, 99457, 99458 | Remote data collection & monitoring |
Now, let’s look at how to implement each service in your clinic.
Intensive Behavioral Therapy (IBT) for Obesity is a Medicare-specific service that compensates providers for the crucial work of facilitating behavioral change. These visits focus on helping patients develop and sustain the habits needed for long-term weight loss.
It is critical to understand that IBT is not an E/M visit. This means no vital signs, no formal history of present illness (HPI), no physical exam, and no discussion of managing comorbidities or medications. As a clinician, it can be challenging to compartmentalize like this. My instinct is always to connect a patient’s behavioral challenges to their underlying medical conditions. However, for billing purposes, these visits must remain strictly focused on the “how-to” of lifestyle modification.
You are there to be a coach and an educator, focusing on two key areas:
You can offer IBT services alongside your regular office visits (on the same day, but as a distinct service) or as standalone appointments, including group sessions. I strongly recommend documenting the IBT encounter in a separate, dedicated note. This note can be short and to the point, clearly outlining the specific nutritional and behavioral topics covered. This creates a clean billing record and avoids confusion with your E/M notes.
One of the most powerful aspects of IBT is that other qualified professionals in your clinic can render these services, such as a Registered Nurse (RN) or a certified health coach. This is a game-changer for practice efficiency. The key requirement is that you, as the billing provider, must directly supervise these staff members. They can be W-2 employees or contracted 1099 staff within your practice. By leveraging your team, you can expand your practice’s bandwidth, provide more frequent touchpoints for patients, and free up your own time to focus on the more complex medical decision-making aspects of care. This is a perfect example of how our integrated model at Injury Medical Clinic works; my health coaches can conduct these IBT sessions under my supervision, reinforcing the plan we established in their medical visit.
For your patients with commercial insurance, the equivalent of IBT falls under preventive screening and counseling services. These are typically billed using CPT codes 99401 through 99404, which are time-based codes for counseling on risk factor reduction.
Functionally, you can structure these visits much like your IBT sessions for Medicare patients. The focus remains on the behavioral aspects of health—diet, exercise, stress, sleep—rather than the diagnosis and treatment of existing diseases. Mirroring your IBT protocol for these preventive visits creates a streamlined, consistent workflow within your clinic, making implementation much easier for you and your staff.
One major difference: unlike IBT, you cannot bill these preventive codes on the same day as an E/M visit with a -25 modifier. These codes must be for a separate encounter on a different day. Therefore, these are standalone appointments dedicated solely to behavioral counseling.
As with IBT, do not discuss a chief complaint, diagnosis, or medical treatment. Again, this is a perfect opportunity to use your ancillary staff. A well-trained RN or health coach can provide this counseling effectively, helping patients execute the plan you’ve laid out while operating under your guidance.
Herein lies a practical challenge. While the Affordable Care Act mandates that most private insurance plans cover preventive services without cost-sharing, my clinical experience has shown that reimbursement for these specific counseling codes (99401-99404) can be inconsistent. Not all payers will reimburse for them, despite the mandate.
To navigate this, I recommend being proactive. If you have the administrative capacity, run an eligibility check for these specific CPT codes when a new patient establishes care or annually. At our clinic, which is primarily focused on obesity and functional medicine, we have dedicated staff who can perform these checks. In a broader primary care setting, this wasn’t feasible. In situations where coverage is uncertain, you have two options:
Chronic Care Management (CCM) is a Medicare program that compensates providers for the substantial time spent on non-face-to-face care coordination for patients with multiple chronic conditions. Think about all the time you and your staff spend on the phone with patients, coordinating with specialists, refilling prescriptions, ordering durable medical equipment, and managing tasks in the EMR. CCM allows you to bill for that time.
For a patient to qualify for CCM, they must have two or more chronic conditions that are expected to last at least 12 months or until the end of life. For those of us treating obesity, this criterion applies to most of our Medicare population. CMS data confirms this, showing that about two-thirds of all Medicare beneficiaries have at least two chronic conditions.
This list of qualifying conditions is extensive and includes most of the common comorbidities we see with obesity:
At its core, CCM centers on creating and maintaining a comprehensive care plan for the patient. This plan should address their problems, treatment goals, specific interventions, and symptom management strategies. It’s a living document that must be reviewed and updated periodically.
The CPT codes for CCM can seem complex, but let’s simplify them. They are divided into primary codes and codes for more complex cases.
Notice the important distinction: some codes can be fulfilled by clinical staff, while others (marked with an asterisk in many guides) must be furnished directly by the billing provider. CMS provides an excellent Chronic Care Management Services Toolkit that I highly recommend. It offers detailed guidance on the specific time requirements, frequency limitations, and documentation standards for each code.
While the rules can be intricate, implementing a CCM program offers immense value. It provides a structured framework for additional touchpoints with your most complex patients, which is critical for keeping them engaged in their obesity treatment plan. This ongoing connection supports accountability, troubleshooting, and reinforcement of the care plan.
A great way to integrate CCM is to use it for follow-up shortly after an initial consultation. For example, a new Medicare patient has their initial E/M visit with me. Three days later, they have a scheduled CCM call with my RN or health coach. This call is billed using code 99490 and reinforces the initial plan, answers any questions that have come up, and ensures the patient is on the right track. From there, you can leverage CCM codes for monthly check-ins with these patients, creating a steady rhythm of support.
We are living in an exciting era of technological advancement, and Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) lets us leverage this technology to create a more efficient, data-driven practice. RPM uses digital devices to collect and transmit patient health data from patients’ homes to our clinic.
In my practice, for example, we use 5G-enabled scales that automatically transmit a patient’s weight, body fat percentage, and other metrics to a secure dashboard integrated with our EMR. This has been a phenomenal engagement tool, particularly for our telehealth patients and those in our hybrid care model. It gives us real-time data, enabling timely interventions and keeping patients mindful of their progress.
When considering an RPM program, there are two non-negotiable requirements:
The RPM billing structure is logical and reimburses at a slightly higher rate than some other ancillary services.
| CPT Code | Description | Time/Data Requirement | Estimated Reimbursement |
| 99453 | Initial setup and patient education on equipment use. | One-time per device | ~$20 |
| 99454 | Supply of the device for daily recording(s) or programmed alert(s) transmission. | Billed monthly, requires at least 16 days of data in 30 days. | ~$50 |
| 99457 | The first 20 minutes of treatment management services by clinical staff in a calendar month. | 20 minutes of interactive communication, care planning, etc. | ~$50 |
| 99458 | Each additional 20 minutes of treatment management services. | Each additional 20 minutes | ~$40 |
So, for each month a patient is enrolled in RPM, you can bill for the device transmission (99454) and the time spent managing that data (99457). This management time can include your RN or health coach calling the patient to discuss their weight trends, troubleshoot a plateau, or celebrate a milestone. This could also involve reviewing data from a remote blood pressure cuff or a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM). This creates a proactive, data-informed feedback loop that is incredibly powerful for managing a chronic disease like obesity.
A final, practical consideration is how you’ll be paid. The two primary models are insurance-based and self-pay (or cash-based).
Accepting insurance has the major advantage of making care accessible to a much larger population. Many people cannot afford to pay out-of-pocket for the kind of intensive, long-term care that obesity requires.
Successfully navigating this model requires persistence, meticulous documentation, and a dedicated administrative team.
A self-pay model offers an alternative that removes the complexities of dealing with insurance companies. In this model, patients pay for services directly at the time of their visit.
Many practices, including those in the functional medicine space, utilize a hybrid model. They may be cash-based for their consultation services but provide patients with a “superbill” that they can submit to their own insurance for potential out-of-network reimbursement. This can offer a middle ground, but it still places the burden of dealing with the insurance company on the patient. Another hybrid model involves having insurance cover H&P and follow-ups while patients pay a separate program fee for education modules, materials, or group classes.
Our ethical stance: we diversify payment structures to improve accessibility and avoid care delays. From my 15+ years in private practice, obesity treatment demand is robust, and with thoughtful program design, patient volume is sustainable—even in self-pay models.
Now, let’s synthesize all these components—E/M visits, behavioral counseling, care coordination, and remote monitoring—into a cohesive, six-month care plan. A structured roadmap like this provides clarity for both the patient and the clinical team. It establishes expectations, builds momentum, and creates a framework for continuous engagement.
I have broken this down into two parallel paths: one for a patient with commercial insurance and one for a patient with Medicare. While I’ve simplified this for clarity, it provides a powerful template for structuring your obesity management program.
This plan is designed to create at least one clinical touchpoint every one to two weeks, blending medical management with intensive behavioral support.
| Month | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Additional Service (Monthly) |
| Month 1 | Initial Visit (99204) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | Medical Follow-Up (99214) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Month 2 | Medical Follow-Up (99214) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | Medical Follow-Up (99213) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Month 3 | Medical Follow-Up (99214) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | Medical Follow-Up (99213) – E/M | Preventive Visit (99402) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Months 4-6 | Continue alternating monthly E/M visits with bi-weekly preventive visits, adjusting frequency based on patient progress and stability. |
The structure for the Medicare patient is similar but utilizes the specific services available to them, like IBT and CCM.
| Month | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Additional Service (Monthly) |
| Month 1 | Initial Visit (99204) + IBT (G0447) | CCM Call (99490) – Coordination | Medical Follow-Up (99214) + IBT (G0473) | IBT Visit (G0473) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Month 2 | Medical Follow-Up (99214) + IBT (G0473) | CCM Call (99490) – Coordination | Medical Follow-Up (99213) + IBT (G0473) | IBT Visit (G0473) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Month 3 | Medical Follow-Up (99214) + IBT (G0473) | CCM Call (99490) – Coordination | Medical Follow-Up (99213) + IBT (G0473) | IBT Visit (G0473) – Behavior | RPM Billing (99454, 99457) |
| Months 4-6 | Continue with monthly E/M + IBT visits, monthly CCM calls, and potentially standalone IBT visits as needed, based on patient progress. |
Now that we have established the principles of a supportive environment and the mechanics of proper coding, I want to bring it all together and show you how these concepts are applied in a real-world, multidisciplinary setting. At Injury Medical Clinic PA in El Paso, Texas, we have built a practice model founded on collaboration and integration, designed to address the multifaceted nature of conditions like obesity.
You might be asking, “How does chiropractic care fit into the treatment of obesity?” I am passionate about answering this question because the connection is profound and often overlooked. From a chiropractic and functional medicine perspective, we do not view obesity as simply an “energy-in, energy-out” problem. We see it as systemic dysfunction, often characterized by chronic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and significant biomechanical stress. Integrative chiropractic care is uniquely positioned to address several key facets of this condition.
A patient presenting at our clinic with obesity embarks on a journey that leverages the full spectrum of our team’s expertise.
This seamless integration of disciplines, under Dr. Cardenas’s strong medical direction, is key to our success. We are not just treating obesity; we are restoring health from the inside out and the outside in. We address the structural, biochemical, neurological, and emotional components of this complex disease, creating a patient-centered journey that is both evidence-based and deeply compassionate.
Over years of practice, certain patterns keep showing up. I share these observations to help patients and clinicians anticipate the road ahead.
You can read more about my clinical reflections and protocols at:
Treating obesity is one of the most challenging, yet most rewarding, endeavors in modern medicine. It requires a profound shift in our thinking—away from an acute, blame-based model and toward a compassionate, long-term, chronic disease management framework. By building our practice on the four pillars of evidence-based care—nutrition, physical activity, behavioral counseling, and medical management—we can offer our patients a legitimate path to lasting health and wellness.
Integrating different disciplines, as we do at Injury Medical Clinic PA, represents the future of this field. Combining the biomechanical and neurological expertise of chiropractic care, the diagnostic and therapeutic rigor of internal medicine under Dr. Cardenas, and the root-cause analysis of functional medicine allows us to create a truly holistic and synergistic treatment plan. We can address the patient’s musculoskeletal pain to enable activity, optimize their metabolic and hormonal milieu to facilitate weight loss, and provide the behavioral and medical support to make it sustainable.
Whether you choose to integrate obesity care into your existing practice, build a clinic-within-a-clinic, or launch a specialty center, the need is immense, and the opportunity to make a life-changing impact on your patients is profound. It demands dedication, continuous learning, and a deep commitment to seeing the whole person behind the disease. I encourage you to embrace this challenge. Your patients are waiting.
SEO Tags: Obesity Care, Integrative Medicine, Chronic Disease Management, Dr. Alex Jimenez, Chiropractic Care, Functional Medicine, Weight Management, Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, El Paso TX, Obesity Treatment Models, Pharmacotherapy for Obesity, GLP-1 Agonists, Behavioral Counseling for Weight Loss, Nutrition for Obesity, Physical Activity, Bariatric Surgery, Multidisciplinary Care, Telehealth, billing and coding for obesity, ICD-10 codes, destigmatize obesity, person-first language, biomechanical stress, chronic inflammation, nervous system regulation, musculoskeletal health, obesity treatment, rehabilitation, personal injury, patient-centered care, evidence-based medicine, functional nutrition, holistic health, E/M billing by time, risk adjustment coding, pediatric obesity, medical billing and coding, CPT codes, time-based billing, medical decision making, MDM, chronic care management, CCM, remote patient monitoring, RPM, intensive behavioral therapy, IBT, weight loss, care plan, healthcare reimbursement, 99214, 99204, G0447, 99490, 99457, Spine Health, Metabolic Health, Insulin Resistance, Hormonal Imbalance, Injury Medical Clinic PA, Mission Plaza Injury Medical Clinic, OMA, AACE obesity guidelines, AHA ACC TOS obesity guideline, Endocrine Society obesity, AGA practice guidelines, medical director obesity clinic, hybrid fee structure obesity care
Professional Scope of Practice *
The information herein on "Chiropractic Practice: A Guide to Obesity Medicine For Health" is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional or licensed physician and is not medical advice. We encourage you to make healthcare decisions based on your research and partnership with a qualified healthcare professional.
Blog Information & Scope Discussions
Welcome to El Paso's Premier Wellness, Personal Injury Care Clinic & Wellness Blog, where Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, FNP-C, a Multi-State board-certified Family Practice Nurse Practitioner (FNP-BC) and Chiropractor (DC), presents insights on how our multidisciplinary team is dedicated to holistic healing and personalized care. Our practice aligns with evidence-based treatment protocols inspired by integrative medicine principles, similar to those on this site and our family practice-based chiromed.com site, and focuses on restoring health naturally for patients of all ages.
Our areas of multidisciplinary practice include Wellness & Nutrition, Chronic Pain, Personal Injury, Auto Accident Care, Work Injuries, Back Injury, Low Back Pain, Neck Pain, Migraine Headaches, Sports Injuries, Severe Sciatica, Scoliosis, Complex Herniated Discs, Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain, Complex Injuries, Stress Management, Functional Medicine Treatments, and in-scope care protocols.
Our information scope is multidisciplinary, focusing on musculoskeletal and physical medicine, wellness, contributing etiological viscerosomatic disturbances within clinical presentations, associated somato-visceral reflex clinical dynamics, subluxation complexes, sensitive health issues, and functional medicine articles, topics, and discussions.
We provide and present clinical collaboration with specialists from various disciplines. Each specialist is governed by their professional scope of practice and their jurisdiction of licensure. We use functional health & wellness protocols to treat and support care for musculoskeletal injuries or disorders.
Our videos, posts, topics, and insights address clinical matters and issues that are directly or indirectly related to our clinical scope of practice.
Our office has made a reasonable effort to provide supportive citations and has identified relevant research studies that support our posts. We provide copies of supporting research studies upon request to regulatory boards and the public.
We understand that we cover matters that require an additional explanation of how they may assist in a particular care plan or treatment protocol; therefore, to discuss the subject matter above further, please feel free to ask Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, or contact us at 915-850-0900.
We are here to help you and your family.
Blessings
Dr. Alex Jimenez DC, MSACP, APRN, FNP-BC*, CCST, IFMCP, CFMP, ATN
email: coach@elpasofunctionalmedicine.com
Multidisciplinary Licensing & Board Certifications:
Licensed as a Doctor of Chiropractic (DC) in Texas & New Mexico*
Texas DC License #: TX5807, Verified: TX5807
New Mexico DC License #: NM-DC2182, Verified: NM-DC2182
Multi-State Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN*) in Texas & Multi-States
Multi-state Compact APRN License by Endorsement (42 States)
Texas APRN License #: 1191402, Verified: 1191402 *
Florida APRN License #: 11043890, Verified: APRN11043890 *
Colorado License #: C-APN.0105610-C-NP, Verified: C-APN.0105610-C-NP
New York License #: N25929, Verified N25929
License Verification Link: Nursys License Verifier
* Prescriptive Authority Authorized
ANCC FNP-BC: Board Certified Nurse Practitioner*
Compact Status: Multi-State License: Authorized to Practice in 40 States*
Graduate with Honors: ICHS: MSN-FNP (Family Nurse Practitioner Program)
Degree Granted. Master's in Family Practice MSN Diploma (Cum Laude)
Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC*, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST
(Board Certified: Family Practice Nurse Practitioner—Multistate)*
(Licensed Nurse Practitioner & Chiropractor - Multistate)*
Clinical Director
Digital Business Card
Dr. Maria Cardenas, MD
(Board Certified: Internal Medicine)
(Licensed Medical Doctor)
Medical Director, Clinical Director & Collaborative Physician
NPI # 1164426748
MD License #: J2933
Licenses and Board Certifications:
MD: Medical Doctor
DC: Doctor of Chiropractic
APRNP: Advanced Practice Registered Nurse
FNP-BC: Family Practice Specialization (Multi-State Board Certified)
RN: Registered Nurse (Multi-State Compact License)
CFMP: Certified Functional Medicine Provider
MSN-FNP: Master of Science in Family Practice Medicine
MSACP: Master of Science in Advanced Clinical Practice
IFMCP: Institute of Functional Medicine
CCST: Certified Chiropractic Spinal Trauma
ATN: Advanced Translational Neutrogenomics
Memberships & Associations:
TCA: Texas Chiropractic Association: Member ID: 104311
AANP: American Association of Nurse Practitioners: Member ID: 2198960
ANA: American Nurse Association: Member ID: 06458222 (District TX01)
TNA: Texas Nurse Association: Member ID: 06458222
NPI: 1205907805
| Primary Taxonomy | Selected Taxonomy | State | License Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 111N00000X - Chiropractor | NM | DC2182 |
| Yes | 111N00000X - Chiropractor | TX | DC5807 |
| Yes | 363LF0000X - Nurse Practitioner - Family | TX | 1191402 |
| Yes | 363LF0000X - Nurse Practitioner - Family | FL | 11043890 |
| Yes | 363LF0000X - Nurse Practitioner - Family | CO | C-APN.0105610-C-NP |
| Yes | 363LF0000X - Nurse Practitioner - Family | NY | N25929 |
Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC*, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST
(Board Certified: Family Practice Nurse Practitioner—Multistate)*
(Licensed Nurse Practitioner & Chiropractor - Multistate)*
Clinical Director
Digital Business Card
Dr. Maria Cardenas, MD
(Board Certified: Internal Medicine)*
(Licensed Medical Doctor)*
Medical Director, Clinical Director & Collaborative Physician
NPI # 1164426748
MD License #: J2933
Legal Peptide Use and Scientific Chiropractic Care: Rules, Safety, and Recovery Abstract I am Dr.… Read More
By Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
SubQ Testosterone Injections: A Scientific Chiropractic Look at a Simpler Hormone Route By Dr. Alex… Read More
By Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
Understanding Forehead Lesion Removal: A Closer Look at Nerve Blocks and Integrative Care Abstract This… Read More
By Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
Personal Injury, Trauma & Spine Rehab Specialists