Understand the positive impact of chiropractic care for gluteus medius tendinopathy on your health and well-being.
Table of Contents
Hip pain is a prevalent and often debilitating condition that significantly impacts an individual’s quality of life, mobility, and overall well-being. While many conventional approaches focus on symptom management through medication or invasive surgery, a more comprehensive, integrative framework offers a path toward addressing the root causes of the pain. This educational article, written from my perspective as Dr. Alex Jimenez, explores the diagnosis and treatment of hip pain, focusing on gluteus medius tendinopathy, a common yet often misdiagnosed condition frequently mistaken for trochanteric bursitis. We will journey through the intricate anatomy of the lateral hip, including the critical roles of the gluteus medius and minimus muscles and their tendons. By understanding their function in pelvic stability and gait, we can better appreciate how dysfunction leads to pain and compensatory patterns.
This post details the clinical evaluation process, from initial patient history and physical examination to advanced diagnostic imaging. We will discuss the latest evidence-based findings from leading researchers, emphasizing a shift away from the outdated concept of “tendinitis” (inflammation) toward “tendinopathy” (degeneration). This distinction is crucial because it guides treatment away from simple anti-inflammatory measures toward regenerative and rehabilitative therapies. We will explore several treatment modalities, including prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, and precision-guided injections, and explain the scientific rationale behind each. This article will also highlight the power of an integrative care model, showing how our team at Injury Medical Clinic combines my expertise in chiropractic care and functional medicine with Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD’s medical oversight to deliver a holistic, patient-centered treatment plan. We will explore how chiropractic adjustments, targeted rehabilitation, and functional medicine principles work together to restore biomechanical integrity, reduce pain, and promote long-term healing.
As a clinician with diverse credentials spanning chiropractic (DC), advanced practice nursing (APRN, FNP-BC), and functional medicine (CFMP, IFMCP), my professional journey has always been guided by a singular mission: to understand and treat the human body as an interconnected system. At Injury Medical Clinic, we have built a practice that embodies this philosophy. We operate within a multidisciplinary framework that places the patient at the very center of their care.
A cornerstone of this model is my collaboration with Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD. Dr. Cardenas is a highly respected, board-certified Internist with over four decades of clinical experience. She serves as our Medical Director and Collaborative Physician, providing invaluable medical oversight and diagnostic expertise. This partnership between a Doctor of Chiropractic/Advanced Practice Nurse and a Medical Doctor is fundamental to our approach, particularly in managing complex cases involving musculoskeletal injuries, chronic pain, and systemic dysfunction.
This integrated setup allows us to offer a comprehensive spectrum of care under one roof:
By integrating these disciplines, we create a synergistic effect. For example, a patient with hip pain receives a comprehensive evaluation that considers spinal alignment, pelvic biomechanics, muscular integrity, and underlying physiological health. The treatment plan isn’t just about injecting the painful tendon; it’s about correcting the faulty movement patterns that overloaded it in the first place, optimizing the body’s healing environment through nutrition, and ensuring complete medical safety and oversight. This is the future of effective, patient-centered healthcare.
Let’s begin with a common scenario we see in our clinic. On September 15th, 2026, a 57-year-old gentleman presented with a two-month history of persistent left hip pain. When a patient describes “hip pain,” the first crucial step is to pinpoint the exact location. The term “hip” can be ambiguous; patients may use it to describe pain in the groin (anterior), the buttock (posterior), or the side of the hip (lateral). Precise anatomical localization is the first key to an accurate diagnosis.
In this gentleman’s case, he pointed to the outer aspect of his hip. I began my physical examination by palpating the greater trochanter, the prominent bony landmark on the side of the femur. His primary tenderness was not directly over the trochanter but slightly posterior and superior to it. This is a critical clinical clue.
I applied firm, targeted pressure to this specific region and asked, “Does this exactly replicate the pain you’ve been experiencing?” He confirmed with a slow but definitive “Yes.” This positive “jump sign,” an involuntary flinch or vocalization of pain when you palpate the affected tendon, is a hallmark indicator. The pain was so specific that I was able to mark the precise epicenter of his discomfort. This detailed feedback is invaluable; it turns the examination from a general survey into a precise diagnostic tool. It tells me that we are not dealing with a vague, diffuse pain but a very localized, structural problem.
For decades, pain in this specific location was almost universally diagnosed as trochanteric bursitis. The bursa is a small, fluid-filled sac that reduces friction between the bony greater trochanter and the overlying iliotibial (IT) band. The prevailing theory was that this bursa became inflamed, causing lateral hip pain. However, modern research, including histological studies and advanced imaging, has dramatically shifted our understanding.
Leading researchers like Dr. Franke, Dr. Grimaldi, and Dr. Cook have shown through meticulous studies that, in most cases of lateral hip pain, the primary pathology is not in the bursa. Instead, the problem lies within the tendons of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles (Franke et al., 2021). The bursa may become secondarily irritated, but it rarely causes the primary pain.
This condition is more accurately termed gluteus medius tendinopathy. Let’s break down this crucial terminology:
This shift in understanding is not merely academic; it fundamentally changes how we treat the condition. If we incorrectly assume the problem is inflammation (bursitis), the logical treatment would be anti-inflammatory medications like NSAIDs or corticosteroid injections. However, if the root cause is degeneration (tendinopathy), these treatments may only provide temporary relief and, with corticosteroids, can even accelerate degeneration and further weaken the tendon over the long term (Coombes et al., 2010). Our goal must be to stimulate healing and regeneration, not just to suppress inflammation.
With our patient, the history and physical exam strongly pointed towards gluteus medius tendinopathy. The location of his pain, specific tenderness on palpation, and symptom reproduction were classic indicators. The next step in our clinical process was to confirm the diagnosis and initiate treatment with a precision-guided injection.
Before any procedure, meticulous preparation is paramount for patient safety and efficacy.
The goal of the injection was to deliver a local anesthetic (and potentially a therapeutic substance) directly into the diseased gluteus medius tendon. This is where clinical experience and tactile feedback become critical. I used a standard 25-gauge, 1.5-inch needle, which is sufficient to reach the gluteus medius insertion in most individuals.
As I advanced the needle, I used my non-dominant hand to stabilize the tissue and provide tactile feedback. I could feel the distinct layers the needle passed through:
I advanced the needle until I felt this characteristic increase in resistance. I believed I was at the correct depth, within the gluteus medius tendon. At this point, the injection serves two purposes.
The first substance I injected was a small amount of a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine or bupivacaine. I asked the patient, “Does that actually feel like the pain that you have?” He responded, “Yes.”
This is known as a concordant pain response. Injecting a small volume of fluid into a confined, sensitized space (the diseased tendon) distends the tissue and temporarily increases pressure, precisely replicating the patient’s familiar pain. This powerfully confirms that the needle is in the exact source of the problem. If the needle were in healthy muscle or the bursa, the patient would likely feel pressure or a different type of discomfort, but not their specific, characteristic pain.
Immediately following this, the anesthetic begins to work. This leads to the second, and arguably more important, diagnostic confirmation: pain relief.
The gluteus medius tendon is not a single point; it’s a broad, fan-shaped structure that inserts over a relatively wide area on the greater trochanter. To ensure the therapeutic agent covers the entire pathological region, I use a technique called “fanning” or “peppering.”
After the initial injection, I slightly withdrew the needle without exiting the skin. I redirected it at a slightly different angle—a bit more superior, then a bit more inferior—delivering a small amount of solution at each new location. This ensures a more comprehensive distribution of the medication throughout the diseased portion of the tendon. I repeated this a few times, advancing the needle to the same depth each time and confirming I remained within the tendinous tissue.
After delivering the full dose, I withdrew the needle and immediately applied firm pressure and massaged the area. This helps further to disperse tand theraTHCtic agents within the tissue and can also help alleviate post-inon sorpost-injectionst-Procedure Assessment: Confirming Diagnostic Accuracy
The moments immediately following the procedure are just as diagnostically important as the procedure itself. Our patient had expressed significant discomfort during the injection, which, while unfortunate, is another indirect sign that we were targeting a highly sensitized, pathological tissue.
As the anesthetic began to take full effect, I performed a post-procedure palpation test. I pressed on the same spot that had caused him to jump with pain just minutes earlier. I asked, “Does this hurt? What I’m doing right now.”
He responded, “Just a little.”
This is a profoundly positive sign. I pressed again over the outside of the hip bone and asked if it was less tender than before. He confirmed, “Yes, it was.”
This significant reduction in tenderness on palpation confirms that the numbing medicine reached the correct spot—the primary pain generator. If his pain had remained unchanged, it would suggest that either (1) the injection missed the target, or (2) the source of his pain was elsewhere (e.g., referred pain from the lumbar spine). The immediate, substantial relief he experienced provided definitive, real-time confirmation of gluteus medius tendinopathy.
This result encouraged me, not just because the patient felt better, but because it validated our diagnostic pathway. We now knew with a high degree of certainty where the problem was, which allows us to formulate an effective long-term treatment plan. We concluded the procedure by placing a simple adhesive bandage over the injection site.
The diagnostic injection provided immediate relief and confirmed the pain source. However, this is just the first step. The anesthetic will wear off in a few hours. True, lasting healing requires addressing the root cause of why the gluteus medius tendon became overloaded and degenerative in the first place. This is where our integrative model at Injury Medical Clinic truly shines.
Gluteus medius tendinopathy rarely develops in isolation. It almost always results from underlying biomechanical dysfunction and compensatory movement patterns.
As a Doctor of Chiropractic, I focus on the biomechanics of the spine and pelvis. The pelvis is the foundation on which the entire spine rests and the crucial link between the torso and the lower extremities. The gluteal muscles, including the gluteus medius, primarily stabilize this foundation. If the foundation is unstable or misaligned, these muscles must work overtime, leading to strain, fatigue, and eventual tendinopathy.
Common underlying issues we look for include:
In our practice, a patient with gluteus medius tendinopathy receives a thorough biomechanical assessment of the spine and pelvis. The treatment plan will invariably include chiropractic adjustments to correct any identified dysfunctions. This is not just “treating the back for hip pain”; it is addressing the fundamental biomechanical faults that created the hip problem.
Once we restore proper joint mechanics through chiropractic adjustments, the next step is retraining the neuromuscular system. The brain has likely adopted compensatory movement patterns due to the chronic pain and underlying dysfunction. We must actively retrain the correct muscles to fire in the correct sequence.
Our rehabilitation program for gluteus medius tendinopathy is progressive and targeted:
This rehabilitation is not generic. We tailor it to the individual’s specific deficits and progress it under our direct supervision to ensure proper form and prevent re-injury.
For chronic or severe tendinopathy, unloading the tendon and strengthening the muscles may not be enough to overcome the tissue’s degenerative state. In these cases, we use advanced regenerative medicine techniques to stimulate the body’s natural healing and repair mechanisms actively. This is a key area where Dr. Cardenas’s medical oversight is essential.
These regenerative procedures follow the same principles of precision and care as the initial diagnostic injection, often using ultrasound guidance to ensure the therapeutic substance is delivered exactly where it is needed most.
Finally, we must consider the systemic environment in which healing occurs. As a certified functional medicine practitioner, I always investigate the underlying physiological factors that may be hindering recovery. A tendon cannot heal effectively amid chronic systemic inflammation, nutritional deficiency, or metabolic dysfunction.
We may assess for and address:
By addressing these systemic factors, we create an internal environment optimized for healing, allowing targeted chiropractic, rehabilitative, and regenerative treatments to be maximally effective.
Our 57-year-old patient’s journey with lateral hip pain illustrates a modern, integrative approach to musculoskeletal care. We moved beyond an outdated and often inaccurate diagnosis of “bursitis” to precisely identify the true pathology: gluteus medius tendinopathy. We confirmed our diagnostic process in real time through a concordant pain response and subsequent anesthetic relief from a precision-guided injection.
However, this was only the beginning. True resolution of his condition lies in a comprehensive, multifaceted treatment plan that addresses the problem from every angle. This includes:
This collaborative, evidence-based model represents a significant departure from the fragmented, symptom-focused care of the past. By understanding the intricate connections between structure, function, and physiology, we can offer our patients a more effective, lasting path to recovery. We don’t just chase the pain; we identify and correct its root causes, empowering our patients to reclaim their mobility and live pain-free.
SEO Tags:
gluteus medius tendinopathy, lateral hip pain, trochanteric bursitis, integrative chiropractic care, Dr. Alex Jimenez, Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, functional medicine, regenerative medicine, prolotherapy, PRP therapy, hip injection, El Paso chiropractor, personal injury clinic, pelvic stability, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, biomechanics, musculoskeletal health, evidence-based medicine, chronic pain treatment
Does Foam Rolling Actually Help—or Does It Just Feel Good? ABSTRACT: Foam rolling can change… Read More
By Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
Does Stretching Actually Prevent Work and Sports Injuries? What the Evidence Says Abstract Static stretching… Read More
By Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
Does “Core Stability” Actually Prevent Back Pain? What the Evidence Says About Strength, Endurance, and… Read More
By: Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST Read More
Personal Injury, Trauma & Spine Rehab Specialists